To tackle this question, one must…. This is the question that former New York City mayor, Edward I. Koch analyzes seven of the most common arguments against the death penalty that he received from his constituents. Then the author placed his thesis on the third paragraph because he wanted to first show the reader that when faced with death, even the criminals see the sanctity of life. But philosophers want to get beyond etymology and dictionary definitions to consider, for example, the nature of justice as both a moral virtue of character and a desirable quality of political society, as well as how it applies to ethical and social decision-making. For many years, there has been a debate of whether or not the death penalty is morally justified. This then influences the way society thinks hence my belief that the use of credible sources in this instance was impeccable.
The most popular concession is to leave the death penalty for only a select few, such as members of the mafia, serial killers, and depraved torturers. Then Koch states in his thesis that life is indeed precious, and that even after examining the arguments of his opponents, he still supports the death penalty. With such a strong and wide variety in terms of line of work, it is my belief that his views communicated in this essay by way of his, logical, ethical and rational appeal are well-thought out and unbiased. Death penalty opponents always claim racism in the meting out of the penalty, conveying that Blacks and Hispanics are victims of that racism. For example in 1994, 80% of citizens supported the death penalty, while today it has gone down to 64%.
He was a member of the U. Death penalty opponents certainly have the right to express their views as they have successfully done for many years, causing a reduction in support for the penalty. Supreme Court, in Furman v. This was a great execution in the area of logos which totally disregarded the opposing claim without a doubt. At the end of his essay, Koch offers an appeal to pathos by describing the death of Kitty Genovese who was stabbed in the street as her neighbors allegedly watched passively. The race of defendants executed in the U. What are the other options? Statistics ultimately speak for themselves, needing no further clarification hence why their use is extremely influential and in this case, utterly persuasive.
There are many solid points between the two disagreeing parties that need to be explored to make an informed decision on which side you would choose to support. Some throughout the text take place as follows: in his first refutation in which he rejects the statement that the death penalty is barbaric and draws and analogy between cancer and murder. The two men apprehended and convicted of the crimes in separate trials were sentenced to death. It is my opinion that the argument presented was unbiased and impartial, taking into the consideration the rebuttal style in which it was written. Opponents argue the possibility of facing the death sentence has no deterrent effect on those who kill in crimes of passion or those who believe they won't get caught. Dannel Malloy signed a law abolishing the death penalty in that state. The state should know better.
Wade ruling prohibiting states from protecting prenatal life. But surely the fact that one might oppose a death sentence in some cases does not necessarily mean he would oppose it in all cases. The concept of human mortality and how it is dealt with is dependent upon one's society or culture. The death penalty is not as simple as an eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth, religious- based, reciprocal-Justice philosophy. New York has since been without the death penalty, as the law has not been amended.
It has already been argued that this place will become a place of murderous inhumanity Mr. Or they murder guards or other prisoners with impunity. Reserving it for certain people also goes against what the Supreme Court ruled: the death penalty is unconstitutional if it is made mandatory for certain crimes. I remain one of those who support the death penalty and, as of this moment in time, the U. The legitimacy of the use of capital punishment has been tarnished by its widespread misuse , which has clouded our judgment regarding the justifiability of the death penalty as a punitive measure. The evaluation will: contain a brief overview of Koch's essay, state whether or not Koch's arguments were strong and persuasive, and state whether the essay was successful in what it was trying to say. .
If your own flesh and blood were brutally murdered, would you want the culprit to live the rest of their life in a cell, or be forced to meet the same fate your innocent loved one did? New York has since been without the death penalty, as the law has not been amended. In what follows I discuss a few of his arguments and show that the death penalty is the most viable approach to deal with convicted murderers. In this article, the author Edward Koch, an outspoken lawyer and former mayor of New York City, uses seven main arguments of why he believes capital punishment is not only necessary but also a way to show how precious human life is 483. It is also the fairest justice that can be given to the victims of serious offenses such as cold-blood murders. Another example can be found in his sixth refutation, where he makes reference to the bible, he establishes credibility by introducing us to the greatest thinkers of the 19th century — Kant, Locke, Hobbes, Rousseau, Montesquieu, and Mill who all agreed that natural law properly authorized the sovereign to take life in order to vindicate justice. He believes that criminals are aware of that statistic, thinking that they will most likely not be executed. A native of New York, born 1924, Koch was an American lawyer, politician, political commentator and a reality television arbitrator.
This same murderer then killed a woman corrections officer. The need to construct more prisons and jails is growing in leaps and bounds and the hungry stomachs of these people have long been siphoning our economic budget. He argues the ethics and politics towards the importance and support of the death penalty. I choose the Aleutians because they are sparsely inhabited, isolated, and are surrounded by frostily cold waters, much like Alcatraz. An example that Koch used is taxation. He begins by assuring those opposed to the death penalty, that he has studied, listened and considered their views impolitely, but he still believes in the death penalty as a means to the practice of social Justice.
Throughout the duration of his essay, Edward uses plenty of rhetorical devices to back up his position. Not all of the Americans in the war died in combat, some died from diseases from infected wounds and terrible living conditions, thus lowering the actual number who died in combat. Koch claims the death penalty is just and defends his statement by using his former public service as ethos, strong language and concrete examples as pathos, and by disproving capital punishment rebuttals as a means of developing logos. The second is to allow 10 years of imprisonment before being sent to this island so that the convicted has time to try to prove their innocence. There is a huge effort worldwide to end the death penalty. Please post comments in English.
Death penalty opponents always claim racism in the meting out of the penalty, conveying that blacks and Hispanics are victims of that racism. This strange graffiti has just a. Koch challenges this with the fact that far more death row inmates appeal their sentence than await their early death. Koch also reflected on the morality of the death penalty. If someone kills another person, he too should be killed as an equal penalty. The recent case of Troy Davis, an African-American, received enormous media attention. Thank you again for being a valued reader of The New American.