In brief: he doesn't have any. As a last name Rainsford was the 73,464 th most popular name in 2010. He recalls desperately digging trenches with insufficient tools while on the European frontlines in World War I. He is referred to but plays no active role in the story. There is one other character… 786 Words 4 Pages The Most Dangerous Game vs.
Both have served in the military, both are able hunters, and both come from considerable means. Zaroff the Philosopher So, here's our question about Zaroff: yes, he's obviously quite crazy. Rainsford and Whitney concur that hunting is the best sport in the world and they are both very experienced hunters. The general serves a delicious meal which shows his own discriminating taste in food and wine, while Rainsford shows his own discriminating taste in enjoying it. He's probably pretty brave, and he's definitely got that. Whether his experience on the island changes his attitude toward hunted animals is open to question. He captures the shipwrecked sailors and forces them to play his game or be tortured and killed by Ivan.
Some He makes kings, some beggars. So who is this guy tracking him through the forest? After all, the Cossack has spent the better part of the last several days trying to kill him! Crewmen of the San Lucar : Shipwrecked sailors held captive in Zaroff's cellar. They play no active role in the story. Zaroff considers killing humans a sport… 692 Words 3 Pages psychotic man. Reason helps more than instinct in situations and I like how you pointed out that when you have the urge to do something, there is a great chance that you will not have the will to fight it because your instinct is what your body tells you to do. Hunting would begin to be less looked upon if someone like the General were to exist.
Rainsford has to words to indicate he had any sympathy to the animals he ends up killing and dismisses the proposal to the animals being hurt and scared by being hunted. Rainsford, however, remembers the grueling, harrowing aspects of warfare. As a result, if anything might happen to Zaroff while playing the game, he will result in receiving help from his advantage. You know, the challenge went out of it. They have hunted before, yet their mindsets are different.
Census Bureau surveyed 264 people with the last name Rainsford. There he maintains his aristocratic lifestyle in his palatial home while pursuing his barbaric hobby. Reason, therefore, transforms mere animals into people and allows them to live together in functioning societies. Themes Reason versus Instinct Pitting Rainsford and General Zaroff against each other in the hunt allows Connell to blur the line between hunter and prey, human and animal, to suggest that instinct and reason are not as mutually exclusive as people have traditionally thought. On this subject, you will love the film stills of this guy. They both have traveled around the world hunting the most desired and exotic game and both have been doing it for a long time.
He thinks they have none. Attitudes for the Hunted Somewhat paradoxically, Zaroff seems to have a much better attitude about that which he hunts than Rainsford does. Someone who is using reason and intellect could easily outsmart someone relying solely on their gut feelings. O is for original, one of a kind! Plus, Zaroff used reason when he was hunting his victims, who used instinct, and he won almost every time. And… bear with us… is there a chance that he becomes the next Zaroff? Having already killed Zaroff's assistant, Ivan, and one of Zaroff's dogs, Rainsford surprises Zaroff in his bedroom. Elements of is an adventurous big-game hunter who confronts the nature of life and death for the first time in his life during his few frightening days on Ship-Trap Island.
He has a butler named Ivan, who is a Cossack, which are strong yet deaf and dumb Ukrainians. Appropriately, it is a suspense-driven work and relies heavily on the use of certain techniques to make sure the reader feels, or at least understands, the terror that the protagonist Sanger Rainsford feels. But is he a hunter or a murderer? Their differences can be seen when they have an argument about the feelings of the hunted animals and the difference between the hunter and the hunted. However, they disagree on the whether animals can have feelings. When he sneaks into the Russian's bedroom at the end of the story, he does not have to state a reason for wanting to kill Zaroff. So I believe that Whitney was the one who feels the worry, not Rainsford.
But Whitney is not as certain, since hebelieves animals do experience a sense of fear when they arehunted, and he believes only the hunter enjoys hunting, and theprey does not enjoy anything about it. Adapting to your prey or your hunter is what differentiates the perfect animal from a standard one. In that area, I believe that reason is stronger than instinct. The general made one of his deepest bows. One is placed in a dark and dreary post war setting, and the other in a vibrant jungle full of wild game hunting and fishing. Rainsford is an American hunter of world renown, and is immediately recognized by General Zaroff as the author of a book on hunting snow leopards in Tibet. He claims it is all her imagination.